Articles

Presence, engagement and adaptive difficulty: why immersive practice improves adherence

"Presence" in a virtual environment elicits realistic, motivated behaviour; but engagement is a lever, not an outcome — it must be paired with evidence-based content.

Rehabilitation's biggest bottleneck is not knowledge but adherence: the patient has to practise again and again. This is where VR holds a trump card.

Presence and immersion

Slater & Wilbur (1997) distinguished "immersion" (a technical property of the system) from "presence" (the feeling of really being there). Slater (2009) later showed that "place illusion" and "plausibility illusion" can elicit realistic behaviour in a virtual environment — turning practice from a chore into an engaging experience.

Gamification and adaptive difficulty

Adaptive difficulty tuned to "flow", plus game-like elements, sustain motivation (Anguera et al., 2013; Mishra et al., 2016). But here is the crucial point: engagement is a lever, not an outcome.

An honest caveat

A systematic review of gamification in cognitive assessment and training found its effect on actual cognitive outcomes is inconsistent (Lumsden et al., 2016); motivational design must therefore be paired with evidence-based content and clinician oversight. SyneuraX is built on exactly this principle: immersion and feedback in service of correct practice, with adaptive difficulty kept in each patient's growth zone.

References

  1. Slater M, Wilbur S. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1997;6(6):603–616. doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
  2. Slater M. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2009;364(1535):3549–3557. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
  3. Lumsden J, Edwards EA, Lawrence NS, Coyle D, Munafò MR. Gamification of cognitive assessment and cognitive training: a systematic review of applications and efficacy. JMIR Serious Games. 2016;4(2):e11. doi:10.2196/games.5888
  4. Anguera JA, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul JL, et al. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature. 2013;501(7465):97–101. doi:10.1038/nature12486
  5. Mishra J, Anguera JA, Gazzaley A. Video games for neuro-cognitive optimization. Neuron. 2016;90(2):214–218. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.010
Back →