Live
Trails
Executive Function, Visual Attention, Cognitive Flexibility
Introduction video
Gameplay
In the Trail task, a set of spheres containing numbers, letters, or various attributes is presented to the client in a 3D space. The client must identify target stimuli and connect them according to specific rules. Throughout the exercise, the client must employ sequencing skills to follow the stimuli in the correct order. For clients who find letters challenging, the “Small to Large” mode provides the same cognitive exercise without the need for letters.
Another mode presents each number in two different colors and requires the client to proceed by alternating between those colors—this is the “Color Trails Test.” Since this version does not depend on reading letters, it is highly suitable for clients with low literacy.
In advanced stages, rules such as alternating numbers and letters, alternating colors or sizes, reverse execution, and computational modes are introduced. As the number of spheres increases and distractor stimuli are added, the client’s visual search, stimulus selection, and cognitive flexibility are more intensely challenged.
Therapeutic purpose
The therapeutic goal of the Trail task is to enhance executive functions, cognitive flexibility, and visual attention. Throughout the session, the client must perform a visual search for target stimuli within a 3D space, identify their sequence, adhere to established connection rules, and adapt their strategy when rules change. Consequently, this exercise engages critical cognitive processes, including sequencing, processing speed, attentional control, and visual search.
This task is designed for integration into cognitive rehabilitation programs for individuals experiencing impairments in executive function and attention. It is indicated for clients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Specific Learning Disorders (sLD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Stroke, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Parkinson’s disease, and Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The tool is highly applicable in hospitals, cognitive rehabilitation centers, occupational therapy clinics, neurology departments, and post-injury or post-stroke recovery facilities.
Clinician guide
Start with numbers. Ensure stable performance in the simple mode before progressing to alternating (number-letter) or color modes.
Recorded metrics
- Speed per step and per chain
- Errors (out-of-order picks)
- The alternating-to-simple speed ratio — automatic, every session
- Head-scan range on wide skies
Science & evidence
Trails trains processing speed, visual search and — in alternating mode — mental switching between two sequences; the very indices the classic paper test measures.
Scientific basis
The exercise is a 3D version of the Trail Making Test, which Reitan (1958) used to indicate brain damage and which originates in the Army test battery (Armitage, 1946). Part B (alternating numbers/letters) depends on task-switching, working memory and interference control (Sánchez-Cubillo et al., 2009); the B-to-A time ratio is a clean index of executive flexibility.
Use in the cognitive treatment pathway
Slowed processing (common in MS and after stroke), post-chemotherapy brain fog and age-related attention decline are targets. Therapy starts with short numeric chains and progresses to alternating mode; the automatic per-session B/A ratio tracks the mental-flexibility trend.
VR & digital evidence
A meta-analysis of the concurrent validity of VR executive-function assessment found significant correlations between VR and traditional measures across flexibility, attention and inhibition subcomponents (Borgnis et al., 2024).
This exercise is a rehabilitation aid, not a substitute for clinical assessment or therapy; program selection and interpretation of results remain with the care team.
References
- Reitan RM. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1958;8(3):271–276. doi:10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271
- Armitage SG. An analysis of certain psychological tests used for the evaluation of brain injury. Psychological Monographs. 1946;60(1):i–48. doi:10.1037/h0093567
- Sánchez-Cubillo I, Periáñez JA, Adrover-Roig D, et al. Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2009;15(3):438–450. doi:10.1017/S1355617709090626
- Borgnis F, et al. Concurrent validity of virtual reality-based assessment of executive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review. 2024. doi:10.1007/s11065-024-09657-z
Gallery
See SyneuraX up close
A live demo session for your care team — a real exercise on the headset, live monitoring on the server, and a walk through the reports. Free, with no commitment.